3.8 Proceedings Paper

NASTAR: Noise Adaptive Speech Enhancement with Target-Conditional Resampling

期刊

INTERSPEECH 2022
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 1183-1187

出版社

ISCA-INT SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOC
DOI: 10.21437/Interspeech.2022-527

关键词

speech enhancement; noise adaptation; contrastive learning; source separation; acoustic retrieval

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a method called NASTAR is proposed, which addresses the training-test acoustic mismatch issue in deep learning-based speech enhancement systems by using only one sample of noisy speech in the target environment. NASTAR utilizes a feedback mechanism to simulate adaptive training data and experimental results show its effectiveness in noise adaptation.
For deep learning-based speech enhancement (SE) systems, the training-test acoustic mismatch can cause notable performance degradation. To address the mismatch issue, numerous noise adaptation strategies have been derived. In this paper, we propose a novel method, called noise adaptive speech enhancement with target-conditional resampling (NASTAR), which reduces mismatches with only one sample (one-shot) of noisy speech in the target environment. NASTAR uses a feedback mechanism to simulate adaptive training data via a noise extractor and a retrieval model. The noise extractor estimates the target noise from the noisy speech, called pseudo-noise. The noise retrieval model retrieves relevant noise samples from a pool of noise signals according to the noisy speech, called relevant-cohort. The pseudo-noise and the relevant-cohort set are jointly sampled and mixed with the source speech corpus to prepare simulated training data for noise adaptation. Experimental results show that NASTAR can effectively use one noisy speech sample to adapt an SE model to a target condition. Moreover, both the noise extractor and the noise retrieval model contribute to model adaptation. To our best knowledge, NASTAR is the first work to perform one-shot noise adaptation through noise extraction and retrieval.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据