4.7 Article

Next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections to Wbb over line production at the LHC

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 106, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074016

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [772099, ST/T000694/1]
  2. STFC consolidated HEP [PPSP226]
  3. STFC consolidated HEP theory Grant [PPSP226]
  4. Cambridge Trust
  5. Trinity College Cambridge
  6. Leverhulme Trust
  7. Isaac Newton Trust
  8. DiRAC Cumulus HPC facility [ST/P002307/1]
  9. BEIS capital funding via STFC capital Grants [ST/R002452/1, ST/R00689X/1]
  10. STFC operations Grant
  11. [683211]
  12. European Research Council (ERC) [772099] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compute the theoretical predictions for the production of a W boson in association with a bottom-quark pair at hadron colliders at NNLO in QCD. We derive an analytic expression for the required two-loop five-particle amplitudes in the leading color approximation employing finite-field methods. Numerical results show an improvement in the perturbative convergence upon inclusion of NNLO QCD corrections.
We compute theoretical predictions for the production of a W boson in association with a bottom-quark pair at hadron colliders at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in QCD, including the leptonic decay of the W boson, while treating the bottom quark as massless. This calculation constitutes the very first 2 -> 3 process with a massive external particle to be studied at such a perturbative order. We derive an analytic expression for the required two-loop five-particle amplitudes in the leading color approximation employing finite-field methods. Numerical results for the cross section and differential distributions are presented for ffiffithe Large Hadron Collider at p s = 8 TeV. We observe an improvement of the perturbative convergence for the inclusive case and for the prediction with a jet veto upon the inclusion of the NNLO QCD corrections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据