3.8 Proceedings Paper

Exploring Situated & Embodied Support for Youth's Mental Health: Design Opportunities for Interactive Tangible Device

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3502135

关键词

mental health; youth; situated support; embodiment; tangible interaction; emotion regulation

资金

  1. UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship [MR/T041897/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to manage emotions effectively is crucial for the psychological and social development of youth. This paper investigates the potential of using technology-enabled objects to provide in-the-moment support for youth in coping with emotionally difficult situations. The findings suggest that such interventions can aid with emotion regulation, self-compassion, and cognitive strategies, and act as emotional companions. The paper also discusses design opportunities for integrating situated and embodied support in mental health interventions for youth.
The ability to manage emotions effectively is critical to healthy psychological and social development in youth. Prior work has focused on investigating the design of mental health technologies for this population, yet it is still unclear how to help them cope with emotionally difficult situations in-the-moment. In this paper, we aim to explore the appropriation, naturally emerging engagement patterns, and perceived psychological impact of an exemplar interactive tangible device intervention designed to provide in-situ support, when deployed with n=109 youth for 1.5 months. Our findings from semi-structured interviews and co-design workshops with a subset of participants (n=44 and n=25, respectively) suggest the potential of using technology-enabled objects to aid with down-regulation and self-compassion in moments of heightened emotion, to facilitate the practice of cognitive strategies, and to act as emotional companions. Lastly, we discuss design opportunities for integrating situated and embodied support in mental health interventions for youth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据