4.4 Review

The role of EZH1 and EZH2 in development and cancer

期刊

BMB REPORTS
卷 55, 期 12, 页码 595-601

出版社

KOREAN SOCIETY BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.5483/BMBRep.2022.55.12.174

关键词

Cancer; Development; Epigenetics; EZH1/2; Heterochromatin; PRC2

资金

  1. Research Resettlement Fund for the new faculty of Seoul National University
  2. Seoul National University College of Medicine, National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIT) [NRF2021R1C1 C1013220, NRF2022R1A5A102641311]
  3. BK21 Four Biomedical Science Program
  4. CreativePioneering Researchers Program through Seoul National University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PRC2/EZH1 and PRC2/EZH2 have distinct functions in early and late developmental stages, and their dysregulation is associated with cancer and developmental diseases. Understanding the differences in their expression patterns, histone methyltransferase activity, and DNA/nucleosome binding activity can provide insights into their roles in heterochromatin formation.
mammalian development through its temporospatial repression of gene expression. EZH1 or EZH2 is the catalytic subunit of PRC2 that mediates the mono-, di- and tri-methylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me1/2/3), H3K27me2/me3 being a hallmark of facultative heterochromatin. PRC2 is a chromatin-modifying enzyme that is recruited to a limited number of nucleation sites, spreads H3K27 methylation and fosters chromatin compaction. EZH1 and EZH2 exhibit differences in their expression patterns, levels of histone methyltransferase activity (HMT) in the context of PRC2, and DNA/nucleosome binding activity. This suggests that their roles in heterochromatin formation are disparate. Dysregulation of PRC2 activity leads to aberrant gene expression and is implicated in cancer and developmental diseases. In this review, we discuss the distinct function of PRC2/EZH1 and PRC2/EZH2 in the early and late developmental stages. We then discuss the cancers associated with PRC2/EZH1 and PRC2/EZH2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据