4.7 Article

A Survey on Haptic Technologies for Mobile Augmented Reality

期刊

ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS
卷 54, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3465396

关键词

Mobile augmented reality; haptic devices; haptic feedback; interactions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Augmented reality applications have gained significant attention and growth in the mobile environment, enabled by advancements in smartphone hardware. However, the mobile nature of these applications can limit user interaction capabilities, particularly input and haptic feedback. This survey analyzes current research issues in human-computer interaction for haptic technologies in mobile augmented reality scenarios, focusing on wearable haptic devices and their possibilities in AR.
Augmented reality (AR) applications have gained much research and industry attention. Moreover, the mobile counterpart-mobile augmented reality (MAR) is one of the most explosive growth areas for AR applications in the mobile environment (e.g., smartphones). The technical improvements in the hardware of smartphones, tablets, and smart-glasses provide an advantage for the wide use of mobile AR in the real world and experience these AR applications anywhere. However, the mobile nature of MAR applications can limit users' interaction capabilities, such as input and haptic feedback. In this survey, we analyze current research issues in the area of human-computer interaction for haptic technologies in MAR scenarios. The survey first presents human sensing capabilities and their applicability in AR applications. We classify haptic devices into two groups according to the triggered sense: cutaneous/tactile: touch, active surfaces, and mid-air; kinesthetic: manipulandum, grasp, and exoskeleton. Due to MAR applications' mobile capabilities, we mainly focus our study on wearable haptic devices for each category and their AR possibilities. To conclude, we discuss the future paths that haptic feedback should follow for MAR applications and their challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据