4.4 Review

The efficacy and safety of adrenergic blockade after burn injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY
卷 80, 期 1, 页码 146-155

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000887

关键词

Burns; adrenergic blockade; beta-blockade; propranolol; hypermetabolism

资金

  1. CONICYT, Chilean government
  2. Career Development Fellowship from National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1048652]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The hypermetabolic state after severe burns is a major problem that can lead to several pathophysiologic changes and produce multiple sequelae. Adrenergic blockade has been widely used to reverse these changes and improve outcomes in burned patients but has not been rigorously evaluated. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the use of adrenergic blockade after burn injury. METHODS The databases MEDLINE via OVID, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to December 2014 with search terms including burns and beta-blockers with appropriate synonyms. Articles were restricted to those published in English, French, or Spanish. Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, and systematic reviews were screened. After an independent screening and full-text review, 10 articles were selected, and an appraisal of risk of bias was performed. RESULTS From 182 articles screened, 9 randomized controlled trials and 1 nonrandomized controlled trial met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses were performed to calculate effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). There was a positive effect favoring propranolol use that significantly decreased resting energy expenditure (g = -0.64; 95% CI, -0.8 to -0.5; p < 0.001) and trunk fat (g = -0.3; 95% CI, -0.4 to -0.1; p < 0.001) as well as improved peripheral lean mass (g = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.3-0.6; p < 0.001) and insulin resistance (g = -1.35; 95% CI, -2.0 to -0.6; p < 0.001). Occurrence of adverse events was not significantly different between the treated patients the and controls. CONCLUSION Limited evidence suggests beneficial effects of propranolol after burn injury, and its use seems safe. However, further trials on adult population with a broader range of outcome measures are warranted. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据