4.6 Review

Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19: Equity-related analyses and update on evidence

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014963.pub2

关键词

-

资金

  1. University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
  2. Cochrane Cancer, Department I of Internal Medicine
  3. University of Leipzig Medical Center, Germany
  4. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
  5. Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin
  6. Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Germany
  7. Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine
  8. Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
  9. Department of Respiratory Medicine
  10. Department of Pulmonary Medicine
  11. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [01KX2021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of systemic corticosteroids in the treatment of people with COVID-19, explore equity-related aspects in specific populations, and keep up with the evolving evidence base using a living systematic review approach.
Background Systemic corticosteroids are used to treat people with COVID-19 because they counter hyper-inflammation. Existing evidence syntheses suggest a slight benefit on mortality. Nonetheless, size of eLect, optimal therapy regimen, and selection of patients who are likely to benefit most are factors that remain to be evaluated. Objectives To assess whether and at which doses systemic corticosteroids are eLective and safe in the treatment of people with COVID-19, to explore equity-related aspects in subgroup analyses, and to keep up to date with the evolving evidence base using a living systematic review approach. Search methods We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register (which includes PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and medRxiv), Web of Science (Science Citation Index, Emerging Citation Index), and the WHO COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease to identify completed and ongoing studies to 6 January 2022. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated systemic corticosteroids for people with COVID-19. We included any type or dose of systemic corticosteroids and the following comparisons: systemic corticosteroids plus standard care versus standard care, diLerent types, doses and timings (early versus late) of corticosteroids. We excluded corticosteroids in combination with other active substances versus standard care, topical or inhaled corticosteroids, and corticosteroids for long-COVID treatment. Data collection and analysis We followed standard Cochrane methodology. To assess the risk of bias in included studies, we used the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' 2 tool for RCTs. We rated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach for the following outcomes: all-cause mortality up to 30 and 120 days, discharged alive (clinical improvement), new need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death (clinical worsening), serious adverse events, adverse events, hospital-acquired infections, and invasive fungal infections. Main results We included 16 RCTs in 9549 participants, of whom 8271 (87%) originated from high-income countries. A total of 4532 participants were randomised to corticosteroid arms and the majority received dexamethasone (n = 3766). These studies included participants mostly older than 50 years and male. We also identified 42 ongoing and 23 completed studies lacking published results or relevant information on the study design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据