3.8 Proceedings Paper

The Pattern is in the Details: An Evaluation of Interaction Techniques for Locating, Searching, and Contextualizing Details in Multivariate Matrix Visualizations

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3517673

关键词

Multi-level navigation; multivariate; matrix; focus plus context; overview plus detail; pan&zoom

类别

-

资金

  1. NSF [III-2107328, IIS-1901030]
  2. NIH [5U54CA225088-03]
  3. Harvard Data Science Initiative
  4. Harvard Physical Sciences and Engineering Accelerator Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Matrix visualizations are commonly used for displaying large-scale network, tabular, set, or sequential data. This article compares the performance of focus+context, pan&zoom, and overview+detail interaction methods in exploring multivariate matrix visualizations. The study finds that the fish-eye lens outperforms other techniques in overall performance, while pan&zoom is faster for locating and searching details, and as good as overview+detail in contextualizing details.
Matrix visualizations are widely used to display large-scale network, tabular, set, or sequential data. They typically only encode a single value per cell, e.g., through color. However, this can greatly limit the visualizations' utility when exploring multivariate data, where each cell represents a data point with multiple values (referred to as details). Three well-established interaction approaches can be applicable in multivariate matrix visualizations (or MMV): focus+context, pan&zoom, and overview+detail. However, there is little empirical knowledge of how these approaches compare in exploring MMV. We report on two studies comparing them for locating, searching, and contextualizing details in MMV. We first compared four focus+context techniques and found that the fish-eye lens overall outperformed the others. We then compared the fisheye lens, to pan&zoom and overview+detail. We found that pan&zoom was faster in locating and searching details, and as good as overview+detail in contextualizing details.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据