4.3 Article

Acid-induced mineral alteration and its influence on the permeability and compressibility of coal

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.04.023

关键词

Acidising; Coal; HCl; HF; Proppants; Permeability; Compressibility

资金

  1. University of Queensland (UQ) Centre for Coal Seam Gas
  2. UQ Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis (CMM)
  3. UQ Centre for Advanced Imaging (CAI)
  4. Analytical Services Laboratory, UQ School of Agriculture and Food Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The natural fracture system in coal serves as the primary conduit for water and gas flow in coal seam gas fields. For low permeability coal with highly mineralised fracture systems, the dissolution and/or modification of mineral occlusions could potentially enhance permeability and improve stress resilience. This study investigated the effect of mineral alteration by hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acid (HCl-HF) on fracture compressibility and coal permeability. Coal core immersion in 15% HF-4% KCl solution has enhanced coal permeability to brine from 0.10 to 0.45 mD and reduced fracture compressibility from 0.020 to 0.006 bar(-1). Enhanced permeability and improved stress resilience were attributed to kaolinite (Al2Si2O6(OH)(4)) dissolution and hieratite (K2SiF6) precipitation, respectively. Geochemical speciation, simulating HF interactions with coal fracture minerals, predicted the occurrence and prevalence of both dissolution and precipitation reactions. Scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy confirmed the mineral alteration phenomena. Identification of resultant structural changes and the differentiation of chemical from physical effects were elucidated using X-ray computed tomography. The overall findings show that mineral alteration by HF yielded relatively large, crystalline minerals that appeared to provide structural support to fractures, resulting in enhanced fluid flow and improved resistance to compression. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据