4.3 Article

Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture: Absorption-desorption capabilities of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), piperazine (PZ) and monoethanolamine (MEA) tri-solvent blends

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.002

关键词

Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture; 2-Amino-2-methyl-l-propanol (AMP); Piperazine (PZ); Monoethanolamine (MEA); Cyclic capacity; Initial desorption rate; Heat duty; Initial absorption rate; Absorption capacity

资金

  1. Petroleum and Petrochemical College at Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  2. Clean Energy Technologies Research Institute (CETRI) at the University of Regina, Canada [SKS4S 0A2]
  3. NPRP from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation) [7 - 1154 - 2 - 433]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, highly concentrated tri-solvent blends containing 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), piperazine (PZ) and monoethanolamine (MEA) were experimentally investigated for their potential capabilities in carbon dioxide (CO2) capture. The concentration of both AMP and PZ were varied but their combined concentration (AMP PZ) was kept at 3 kmol/m(3) to limit the possibility of precipitation, the maximum PZ concentration (1.5 kmol/m(3)), and the total aqueous amine solution concentration (6 kmol/m(3)). At atmospheric pressure condition, the absorption process was carried out at 313 K and 15.1%v/v CO2 while 363 K was used for the desorption analysis. Experimental results indicated that all the AMP PZ MEA tri-solvent blends possessed higher cyclic capacities, initial desorption rates, and lower heat duties (50-54.5%) compared to the standard 5 kmol/m(3) MEA. For the initial absorption rates, only the tri-solvent blends with AMP/PZ molar ratios of 1 and 2 were higher than 5 kmol/m(3) MEA. These findings, most especially the significant reduction in heat duty by halve reveal the prospects of AMP PZ MEA tri-solvent blends for CO2 capture applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据