4.3 Article

Effect of surface chemistry for CH4/CO2 adsorption in kerogen: A molecular simulation study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.03.097

关键词

CH4; CO2; Kerogen; Adsorption; Molecular simulation; Volumetric stain

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51304232, 51490654, 51234007]
  2. Major Programs of Ministry of Education of China [311009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular dynamics simulation and Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation are used to investigate methane adsorption and diffusion. in kerogen. The adsorption isotherms of CH4/CO2 have been investigate by GCMC simulations at different temperatures, Adsorption behavior of both methane and carbon dioxide exhibit type-I Langmuir adsorption behavior, Langmuir equation can be used to fit for these isotherms. The temperature has a negative effect on gas adsorption, the adsorption amounts will decrease with increasing temperature at a given pressure. From the excess adsorption isotherms, there is a maximum adsorption for each temperature, suggesting there exists an optimum pressure for maximum methane storage at specific temperature. Furthermore, van der Waals interaction between adsorbate and kerogen plays a dominant role compared with Coulomb interaction in the process of adsorption, especially for CH4. The N- and S-containing function groups in kerogen have more positive effect on the single-component adsorption of CH4/CO2. The self-diffusion coefficient of CH4/CO2 which is investigated by MD simulations combined with Einstein fluid equation increase with the temperature increase at same pressure. The self-diffusion coefficient decrease with the pressure increase at same temperature. The radial distribution function is used to study structural information of CH4/CO2 adsorbed in kerogen. The volumetric strain has a direct correlation with the injected gas composition, at 340 K, the largest volumetric stain of 4.45% for CH4 and 6.52% for CO2. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据