4.6 Article

1,8-Naphthalimide-based nonfullerene acceptors for wide optical band gap polymer solar cells with an ultrathin active layer thickness of 35 nm

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 4, 期 24, 页码 5656-5663

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6tc01438k

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF of China [51003006, 91233205, 21504006, 21534003]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2132042]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three novel 1,8-naphthalimide-based small molecular acceptors (NI-A-C4, NI-A-C6 and NI-A-C8) were designed and synthesized. The LUMO levels of these three small molecules were high-lying, which significantly reduce the energy loss between the wide optical band gap polymer (WBGP) PBDTBT-C12 and the acceptors and result in a high open circuit voltage (Voc) in solar cells. In addition, these three acceptors are planar, crystalline and H-aggregated in the solid state, which can facilitate the electron transport in blend films and lead to superior electron mobility and short circuit current (Jsc). A PCE of 4.05% with a Voc of 1.08 V was obtained for PBDTBT-C12: NI-A-C6-based polymer solar cells (PSCs) in an active layer thickness of 35 nm. Such a PCE is comparable to that of PBDTBT-C12: PC71BM-based optimized devices (4.07%) and better than devices with an active layer thickness of approximately 30 nm (2.72%). Besides, 35 nm is the thinnest active layer thickness for PSCs with a PCE above 4% and the absorption onset of PBDTBT-C12: NI-A-C6-blend films was as low as 630 nm, leading to a significantly high average visible transmittance up to 76.1%. Ultimately, a relatively high PCE and ultrahigh transmittance were achieved simultaneously, demonstrating that 1,8-naphthalimide-based small molecules are promising acceptors for tandem or semi-transparent PSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据