4.6 Article

Fabrication of dual-side metal patterns onto textile substrates for wearable electronics by combining wax-dot printing with electroless plating

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 4, 期 29, 页码 7156-7164

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6tc01979j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61371019]
  2. Shanghai Civil-military Integration Project [140217]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Textile wearable electronics offer the consolidated advantages of both electronics and textile characteristics. Wearable electronic systems typically require conductive tracks as a platform to integrate electronic components. Herein we developed a site-selective electroless plating process to construct dual-side Cu patterns onto textile substrates. The proposed craft was mainly comprised of four procedures, namely, 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS)-modification, wax-pattern printing, selective Au-seeding and Cu-pattern deposition. Specifically, waxes were transferred from commercial wax impregnated papers to APTMS modified fabrics with the aid of a conventional stylus printer. Intensive waxed dots then composed a wax pattern which corresponded to the input image designed on the computer. The wax pattern acted as a hydrophobic mask on the fabric surface and hindered the covered areas from being activated by subsequent Au catalysts. The non-covered areas, in contrast, were APTMS naked surfaces which normally adsorbed Au nanoparticles and had Cu tracks grown. The minimum width of the Cu track was 400 mu m with 3.57% deviation and the typical resistivity was 7.52.0 mu Omega cm, which was about 4.6 times that of the bulk metal Cu (at room temperature). The reliabilities of textile-based conductive Cu patterns were confirmed by air-exposure, ultrasonic washing and Scotch (R)-tape tests. In addition, the universality and versatility of the proposed method were validated by fabricating different metal patterns on various types of flexible substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据