4.7 Article

When is the Convergence Time of Langevin Algorithms Dimension Independent? A Composite Optimization Viewpoint

期刊

出版社

MICROTOME PUBL

关键词

(Stochastic gradient) Langevin algorithm; convergence rates; Markov chain Monte Carlo; composite optimization; stochastic optimization

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-SCALE MoDL (2134209), NSF-CCF-2112665]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  3. Facebook Research Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There has been a growing body of research on bridging MCMC sampling and optimization, focusing on adapting convergence analysis techniques from optimization to the Langevin algorithms in MCMC sampling. This paper provides a positive answer to the long-standing question of whether dimension independent convergence rates can be achieved by the Langevin algorithm for Lipschitz or smooth convex functions with normal priors. By treating the Langevin algorithm as composite optimization, a new analysis technique is developed, leading to dimension independent convergence rates for such problems.
There has been a surge of works bridging MCMC sampling and optimization, with a specific focus on translating non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for optimization problems into the analysis of Langevin algorithms in MCMC sampling. A conspicuous distinction between the convergence analysis of Langevin sampling and that of optimization is that all known convergence rates for Langevin algorithms depend on the dimensionality of the problem, whereas the convergence rates for optimization are dimension-free for convex problems. Whether a dimension independent convergence rate can be achieved by the Langevin algorithm is thus a long-standing open problem. This paper provides an affirmative answer to this problem for the case of either Lipschitz or smooth convex functions with normal priors. By viewing Langevin algorithm as composite optimization, we develop a new analysis technique that leads to dimension independent convergence rates for such problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据