3.8 Review

Developmental and reproductive toxic effects of exposure to microplastics: A review of associated signaling pathways

期刊

FRONTIERS IN TOXICOLOGY
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2022.901798

关键词

BTB-blood-testis barrier; MPs-microplastics; developmental toxicity; signaling; reproductive toxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the impact of microplastics on male and female reproductive systems and the associated mechanisms involved in reproductive and developmental toxicities. Evidence shows that the accumulation of microplastics has harmful effects on the reproductive systems of humans and animals, involving various signaling pathways.
Microplastics (MPs), small pieces of plastic (similar to 5 mm), are released into the environment not only as a result of the decomposition of large-sized plastics but also from day-to-day use of plastic products. Chronic exposure to MPs has been attributed to harmful effects on aquatic organisms and rodents. Effects include gastrointestinal toxicity, hepatotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and reproductive and developmental toxicities. Exposure to MPs may also potentially affect human health. Herein, we reviewed the impact of MPs on male and female reproductive systems and the associated mechanisms involved in the reproductive and developmental toxicities of MPs. We performed a literature search in Google Scholar and PubMed using the following keywords: MPs and reproductive toxicity; MPs and developmental studies; MPs and infertility; MPs and aquatics; and MPs and rodents. Evidence of MPs accumulation has been reported in many organs of humans and experimental models. The harmful effects of MPs have been manifested in male and female reproductive systems of mammalian and aquatic animals, including developmental effects on gametes, embryos, and their offspring. This review describes various signaling pathways involved in MPs-associated male and female reproductive and developmental toxicities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据