4.8 Article

Hybrid time synchronization protocol for large-scale wireless sensor networks

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.j1csuci.2022.10.030

关键词

Average consensus; Clock synchronization; Fast convergence; Flooding; Hybrid; Large-scale; Time synchronization; Wireless sensor network

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2022R1I1A3072355]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a hybrid time synchronization protocol (HTSP) that combines the advantages of reference-based and consensus-based approaches. HTSP effectively reduces convergence time and handles node failures in large-scale wireless sensor networks.
There are two common approaches to design a time synchronization protocol as reference-based and consensus-based. The first approach is mainly employed in protocols operating in large-scale wireless sensor networks (WSNs) because of its fast convergence. However, reference-based time synchronization protocols are vulnerable to node-failure in real -world applications. Although consensus -based time synchronization protocols do not experience the aforementioned problem, they are not suitable for operation in large-scale WSNs owing to their slow convergence. In this study, we propose a hybrid time synchronization protocol (HTSP) to utilize the advantages of both approaches. In particular, HTSP exploits a temporary reference node to significantly reduce the convergence time and employs average-based consensus during normal operation to cope with node failures. It is notable that each node in HTSP can seamlessly switch between the reference and consensus modes during its operation. Moreover, HTSP is a fully distributed protocol as it does not rely on any leader-election mechanism. Our simulation results demonstrated that HTSP outperforms flooding, gradient, and virtual link-based time synchronization protocols considering various types of network topologies and scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据