4.6 Article

High biocompatibility and improved osteogenic potential of amorphous calcium carbonate/vaterite

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 376-386

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5tb02228b

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [268476, 604036, 311848]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Schr 277/10-3]
  3. International Human Frontier Science Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In human bone, amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) is formed as a precursor of the crystalline carbonated apatite/hydroxyapatite (HA). Here we describe that the metastable ACC phase can be stabilized by inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) that is also used as a phosphate source for the non-enzymatic carbonate/phosphate exchange during HA formation. This polymer was found to suppress the transformation of ACC into crystalline CaCO3 at a percentage of 5% [ w/w] (CCP5'') with respect to CaCO3 and almost completely at 10% [ w/w] (CCP10''). Both preparations (CaCO3/polyP) are amorphous, but also contain small amounts of vaterite, as revealed by XRD, FTIR and SEM analyses. They did not affect the growth/viability of SaOS-2 cells. Cell culture and Ca2+ release experiments revealed that the CaCO3 particles formed in the presence of polyP (CaCO3/polyP) are degradable and, unlike calcite, become disintegrated with time during the cell culture incubation. Again in contrast to calcite, CCP5'' and CCP10'' were found to exhibit osteogenic activity and induce the expression of alkaline phosphatase gene in SaOS-2 cells as well as in human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). In vivo studies in rats, using PLGA microspheres inserted in the muscles of the back of the animals, revealed that the encapsulated CCP10'' is not only biocompatible but also supports the regeneration at the implant region. We conclude that ACC containing small amounts of vaterite has osteogenic potential and offers superior properties compared to the biologically inert calcite with respect to a potential application as a scaffold material for bone implants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据