4.6 Article

Electroactive degradable copolymers enhancing osteogenic differentiation from bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 471-481

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5tb01899d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [xjj2013029]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21304073]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have attracted great interest in the field of regenerative medicine, particularly in bone regeneration. Osteogenic differentiation from MSCs is regulated by various environmental factors including hormones, growth factors, chemicals and physical cues from biomaterials. We present the use of electroactive degradable copolymers to guide the osteogenic differentiation from bone marrow derived MSCs (BMSCs). The biodegradable conductive copolymers based on polylactide and tunable contents of the aniline oligomer were synthesized by ring opening polymerization and free radical polymerization, and subsequent functionalization with the aniline tetramer. Electroactive nanofibrous scaffolds were created via a thermally induced phase separation technique. The cell culture of BMSCs and MC3T3-E1 cells on electroactive copolymers showed that these copolymers were cytocompatible and the proliferation for both cells was significantly enhanced. Osteogenic differentiation from BMSCs on the electroactive copolymers was promoted compared to polylactide in terms of gene expression and von Kossa staining. Furthermore, protein adsorption on the electroactive copolymer surface was greatly increased, and this may contribute to the enhanced proliferation and differentiation of BMSCs. This is the first report about degradable electroactive polymers directing osteogenic differentiation from BMSCs and the results indicated that electroactive degradable polymers have great potential for application in bone regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据