4.6 Article

Glycosylated gold nanoparticle libraries for label-free multiplexed lectin biosensing

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 4, 期 18, 页码 3046-3053

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5tb01994j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Innovative Uses for Advanced Materials in the Modern World (AM2)
  2. Advantage West Midlands (AWM)
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  4. MOAC doctoral training centre [EPSRC EP/F500378/1]
  5. Warwick Institute for Advanced Study
  6. BBSRC Systems Biology [BB/G530233/1]
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1090811] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycan/lectin interactions drive a wide range of recognition and signal transduction processes within nature. However, their measurement is complicated or limited by the analytical tools available. Most technologies require fluorescently labelled proteins (e.g. microarrays) or expensive infrastructure (such as surface plasmon resonance). This also limits their application in biosensing, especially for low-resource settings, where detection of pathogens based on glycan binding could speed up diagnosis. Here we employ a library-oriented approach to immobilise a range of monosaccharides onto polymer-stabilised gold nanoparticles to enable rapid and high-throughput evaluation of their binding specificities with a panel of lectins. The red to blue colour shift upon gold nanoparticle aggregation is used as the output, removing the need for labelled protein, enabling compatibility with 96-well microplates. Furthermore, we demonstrate the use of a flatbed scanner (or digital camera) to extract biophysical data, ensuring that only minimal resources are required. Finally, linear discriminant analysis is employed to demonstrate how the glyconanoparticles can be applied as a multiplexed biosensor capable of identifying pathogenic lectins without the need for any infrastructure and overcoming some of the issues of lectin promiscuity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据