4.6 Article

High performance free-standing films by layer-by-layer assembly of graphene flakes and ribbons with natural polymers

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 4, 期 47, 页码 7718-7730

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6tb02344d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)
  2. European program FEDER/COMPETE [BioSeaGlue: EXPL/CTM-BIO/0646/2013 (FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-041105), PEst-C/CTM/LA0025/2013, LA 25 - 2013-2014]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BPD/96797/2013, SFRH/BD/97606/2013, SFRH/BD/87214/2012]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/97606/2013, SFRH/BD/87214/2012, PEst-C/CTM/LA0025/2013, EXPL/CTM-BIO/0646/2013] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, novel free-standing (FS) films based on chitosan, alginate and graphene oxide (GO) were developed through layer-by-layer assembly. First, GO was synthesized from graphite and multi-walled carbon nanotubes using a modified Hummer's method, yielding oxidized graphene flakes (o-GFs) and oxidized graphene nanoribbons (o-GNRs), respectively, which were then characterized. Then FS films were produced and their morphological, thermal and mechanical properties, as well as the o-GF and o-GNR dispersion along the films were assessed. Their degradation and swelling profiles as well as their biological behavior were evaluated. Graphite and nanotubes were successfully oxidized and exfoliated forming stable suspensions that could be combined with chitosan (CHI) and alginate (ALG) solutions by layer-by-layer processing. The addition of o-GFs and o-GNRs resulted in rougher, hydrophilic FS films with significantly improved mechanical properties relative to CHI/ALG films. The presence of o-GFs or o-GNRs did not affect the thermal stability and the addition of o-GFs resulted in films with enhanced cytocompatibility. The results demonstrate the high potential of the GO reinforced films for biomedical applications, in particular o-GF films, for wound healing, and cardiac and bone engineering applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据