4.6 Article

Biocompatible polymer-metal-organic framework composite patches for cutaneous administration of cosmetic molecules

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 4, 期 43, 页码 7031-7040

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6tb01652a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Universite Versailles Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  3. French ANR through a VirMIL MatePro project
  4. Investissements d'Avenir program (LabexNanoSaclay) [ANR-10-LBX-0035]
  5. BioMOFs [EU-ERC-2007-209241]
  6. Cnano BioMIL project
  7. Spanish Ramon y Cajal Programme [2014-16823]
  8. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union [291803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite increasing interest in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) in the biomedical field, developing specific formulations suitable for different administration routes is still a main challenge. Here, we propose a simple, fast and bio-friendly press-molding method for the preparation of cutaneous patches based on composites made from the drug nanocarrier MIL-100(Fe) and biopolymers. The physicochemical properties of the patches (structure, hydration, bioadhesive and swelling properties), as well as their encapsulation and release capabilities (both in ex vitro and ex vivo models), were evaluated using active ingredients such as the challenging cosmetic liporeductor, caffeine, and the model analgesic and anti-inflammatory drug, ibuprofen. In particular, very high caffeine loadings were entrapped within these cutaneous devices with progressive releases under simulated cutaneous physiological conditions as a consequence of the swelling of the hydrophilic patches. Despite the absence of any cutaneous bioadhesive character, these patches provided progressive and suitable permeation of their cosmetic cargo through the skin, interestingly reaching the targeted adipose tissue. This makes these cosmetic-containing composite MOF-based patches promising candidates for new cutaneous devices in cosmetic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据