4.6 Article

Cobalt phosphate nanoparticles decorated with nitrogen-doped carbon layers as highly active and stable electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 4, 期 21, 页码 8155-8160

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta01929c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB933700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572253, 21271165]
  3. NSFC [51561135011]
  4. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [51561135011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One promising approach to the production of clean hydrogen energy from electrochemical water splitting mainly relies on the successful development of earth-abundant, highly efficient and stable electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Herein, we report the synthesis of robust cobalt phosphate nanoparticles (NPs) decorated with nitrogen-doped carbon layers (denoted as Co-3(PO4)(2)@N-C) using O-phospho-DL-serine as both phosphate and carbon sources by hydrothermal treatment. The obtained Co-3(PO4)(2)@N-C catalyst exhibits a remarkable electrocatalytic performance for the OER in alkaline media. A current density of 10 mA cm(-2) is generated at a overpotential of only 317 mV with a small Tafel slope of 62 mV per decade in 1 M KOH electrolyte, which is even superior to those of state-of-the-art noble metal catalysts such as benchmark IrO2 catalysts. Notably, the Co-3(PO4)(2)@N-C electrode shows excellent stability evaluated by 1000 potential cycles and operation with a high current density at a fixed potential for 8 h, which is highly desirable for a promising electrocatalyst The excellent activity can be attributed to the unique network structure of materials, a large number of active sites and good conductivity under catalytic conditions. Our findings imply the possibility for the development of robust and cost-efficient cobalt phosphate as a promising candidate to replace high-cost and scarce noble metal catalysts for electrochemical water splitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据