4.6 Article

Seaweed biomass derived (Ni,Co)/CNT nanoaerogels: efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution and reduction reactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 4, 期 17, 页码 6376-6384

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta00591h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51473081, 21501105, 51503109]
  2. ARC Discovery Project [130104759]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20152M058]
  4. State Key Lab of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing earth-abundant, active and stable electrocatalysts which operate in two-electrode rechargeable metal-air batteries, including both oxygen evolution and reduction reactions (OER and ORR), is vital for renewable energy conversion in real application. Here, we demonstrate a three-dimensional (3D) bifunctional nanoaerogel electrocatalyst that exhibits good electrocatalytic properties for both OER and ORR. This material was fabricated using a scalable and facile method involving the pyrolysis of (Ni,Co)/CNT alginate hydrogels derived from sustainable seaweed biomass after an ion exchange process. The bifunctionality for oxygen electrocatalysis as shown by the OER-ORR potential difference (DE, the OER and ORR potentials are taken at the current densities of 10 mA cm(-2) and (-3) mA cm(-2) in 0.1 M KOH, respectively) could be reduced to as low as 0.87 V, comparable to the state-of-the-art non-noble bifunctional catalysts. The good performance was attributed to the ternary Ni/NiO/NiCo2O4 catalytic center for charge transfer and 3D hierarchical mesoporous hybrid framework for efficient mass transport. More importantly, the Zn-air battery fabricated with the hybrid nanoaerogel as a bifunctional electrocatalyst displays very high energy efficiency (58.5%) and long-term stability. Prospectively, our present work may pave a new way to develop earth-abundant and low cost high-performance bifunctional electrocatalysts for rechargeable metal-air batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据