4.6 Article

A practical approach to synthesize polyamide thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes with improved separation properties for water/wastewater treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 4, 期 11, 页码 4134-4144

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta09252c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Government Department of Education
  2. UTM [Q.J130000.2446.03G38]
  3. Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE) [R.J090301.7846.4J174]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes containing 0.05 or 0.10 w/v% surface-functionalized titanate nanotubes (TNTs) in a polyamide selective layer were synthesized via interfacial polymerization of piperazine (PIP) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) monomers. Nanomaterials were dispersed into the monomer solution using two different approaches. In the first one, the functionalized TNTs were dispersed into the amine aqueous solution, while in the second approach the same nanomaterials were dispersed in TMC organic solution. The TFN membranes were characterized and compared with a control thin film composite (TFC) membrane to investigate the effect of nanofiller loadings and the fabrication approach on membrane properties. Results showed that introducing nanofillers into the organic phase was more effective to synthesize a TFN membrane of greater separation performance as the use of a rubber roller to remove aqueous solution from the substrate surface could cause the loss of a significant amount of nanofillers, which further affected the polyamide layer integrity. It was also found that the incorporation of a high nanofiller loading tended to interfere with interfacial polymerization and weaken the bonds between monomer blocks, resulting in poor polyamide-nanotube integrity. Compared to the TFC membrane, the TFN membrane made of 2% PIP and 0.15% TMC with 0.5% nanofiller incorporation could achieve greater water flux (7.5 vs. 5.4 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1)) and Na2SO4 rejection (96.4% vs. 86%) while exhibiting higher resistance against fouling by protein and dye.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据