4.6 Article

A silver-copper metallic glass electrocatalyst with high activity and stability comparable to Pt/C for zinc-air batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 4, 期 9, 页码 3527-3537

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta09266c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51271148, 50971100]
  2. Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing in China [30-TP-2009]
  3. Aeronautic Science Foundation Program of China [2012ZF53073]
  4. Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Western Metal Materials [XBCL-2-11]
  5. Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China [20136102110013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Highly active electrocatalysts with good long term stability are vital for the commercialization of metal air batteries and alkaline fuel cells which involve the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at the cathode end. Herein, we developed a pulsed laser deposition (PLD) technique for the precise fabrication of silver-copper metallic glass (AgCu-MG) electrocatalysts. This PLD technique provides excellent control over the surface microtopography along with high flexibility for the deposition of different compositions of silver-copper metallic glass electrocatalysts onto nickel foam. Among all investigated Ag-based catalysts, AgCu-MG catalysts exhibit high electrocatalytic activity with a half-wave potential of 0.67 V (vs. RHE) which can be in situ enhanced by dealloying treatment in N-2 saturated 0.1 M KOH solution. In situ dealloying of the AgCu-MG provides exceptional ORR catalytic activity with a half-wave potential of 0.78 V (vs. RHE) at 1600 rpm, which is comparable to 0.81 V (vs. RHE) of commercial Pt/C-20%. The AgCu-MG electrocatalyst showed excellent long-term stability in rechargeable zinc-air batteries. After 1000 charge-discharge cycles at 20 mA cm(-2), the discharge voltage of batteries was stable at 1.0 V demonstrating the potential application of AgCu-MG as an alternative to Pt/C-20% in zinc-air batteries and alkaline fuel cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据