4.6 Article

Porous nanoMoC@graphite shell derived from a MOFs-directed strategy: an efficient electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 4, 期 16, 页码 6006-6013

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta01900e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2013CB934101]
  2. NSFC [21433002, 21373102, 21573046]
  3. Sinopec [X514005]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M580289]
  5. National Plan for Science and Technology of Saudi Arabia [14-PET827-02]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2015A030306014, 2014TQ01N036]
  7. Guangdong Higher Education Institute [YQ2013022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hydrogen evolution reaction using noble-metal free electrocatalysts has captured increasing attention due to its importance in renewable hydrogen production. Herein, a highly active and stable electrocatalyst of MoC encapsulated by graphitized carbon shells (nanoMoC@GS) has been developed via an in situ carburization of a Mo-based metal-organic framework (Mo-MOF) with the atomic periodic structure. The ultrafine MoC nanoparticles (similar to 3 nm) confined by 1-3 layered graphite shells significantly favor the efficient HER in both acidic and basic media. In particular, a low overpotential (eta(10) = 124 and 77 mV at a current density of -10 mA cm(-2)), a small Tafel slope (43 and 50 mV dec(-1)) and a high exchange current density (j(0) = 0.015 and 0.212 mA cm(-2)) are achieved on nanoMoC@GS in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 1.0 M KOH, respectively. Such remarkable activity, outperforming most current noble-metal-free electrocatalysts, stems from the cooperative/synergistic effects of ultrafine MoC nanostructure, ultrathin and conductive graphitized carbon shells, and enriched porosity. This work demonstrates a feasible way to design high-performance electrocatalysts via converting atomic contact hybrid structures (e.g., MOFs), illustrating a new perspective for developing nanocatalysts in the energy chemistry field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据