4.6 Article

Stabilization of catechol-boronic ester bonds for underwater self-healing and recycling of lipophilic bulk polymer in wider pH range

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 4, 期 37, 页码 14122-14131

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta05121a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51273214, 51673219, 51333008]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [S2013020013029]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [2014J4100121]
  4. Basic Scientific Research Foundation in Colleges and Universities of Ministry of Education of China [15lgzs103, 14lgqt01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To develop a lipophilic bulk polymer capable of self-healing and recycling for future structural applications in different aquatic environments, hyperbranched polyurethane containing a few hydrophilic quaternary ammonium salts and abundant dynamic reversible catechol-B3+ crosslinkages is synthesized as our first step in this direction. The compositional and structural design ensures dynamicity of the polymer networks as well as effective interdiffusion and interaction of dangling chains on the damaged surface in water. More importantly, the boronic ester bonds become not easily hydrolyzed at lower pH due to the electron attracting effect of quaternary ammonium cations from catechol-B3+ bonds. Qualitative visual inspection and quantitative tensile tests demonstrate that the proposed idea works, and the target polymer is allowed to be self-healed and reprocessed in waters at pH 7 and 9 at room temperature. Reshuffling and rearrangement of the polymer networks via dynamic reversible coordination of catechol-B3+ bonds helps to re-bond the interface. The technical route provides an effective solution to stabilizing catechol-B3+ bonds at lower pH, and obviously reduces the pH sensitivity of boronic ester bonds, which is the objective of the current work. As a result, the adaptivity and serviceable range of the underwater intrinsic self-healing polymer are expanded.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据