4.6 Article

Synthesis of a porous sheet-like V2O5-CNT nanocomposite using an ice-templating 'bricks-and-mortar' assembly approach as a high-capacity, long cyclelife cathode material for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 4, 期 7, 页码 2729-2737

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta10414a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Applied Fundamental Foundation of Sichuan Province [2014JY0202]
  2. R&D Foundation of China Academy of Engineering Physics [2014B0302036]
  3. Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Sichuan Province [2016JQ0025]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21401177, 21501160]
  5. Chinese Government
  6. Collaborative Innovation Foundation of Sichuan University [XTCS2014009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tailoring the nanostructures of electrode materials is an effective way to enhance their electrochemical performance for energy storage. Herein, an ice-templating bricks-and-mortar assembly approach is reported to make ribbon-like V2O5 nanoparticles and CNTs integrated into a two-dimensional (2D) porous sheet-like V2O5-CNT nanocomposite. The obtained sheet-like V2O5-CNT nanocomposite possesses unique structural characteristics, including a hierarchical porous structure, 2D morphology, large specific surface area and internal conducting networks, which lead to superior electrochemical performances in terms of long-term cyclability and significantly enhanced rate capability when used as a cathode material for LIBs. The sheet-like V2O5-CNT nanocomposite can charge/discharge at high rates of 5C, 10C and 20C, with discharge capacities of approximately 240 mA h g(-1), 180 mA h g(-1), and 160 mA h g(-1), respectively. It also retains 71% of the initial discharge capacity after 300 cycles at a high rate of 5C, with only 0.097% capacity loss per cycle. The rate capability and cycling performance of the sheet-like V2O5-CNT nanocomposite are significantly better than those of commercial V2O5 and most of the reported V2O5 nanocomposite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据