4.7 Article

Optimal Spin Polarization Control for the Spin-Exchange Relaxation-Free System Using Adaptive Dynamic Programming

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3230200

关键词

3-D spin polarization control (3DSPC); adaptive dynamic programming (ADP); asymmetric input constraint; multicritic multiaction neural networks (MCMANNs); multiphysics; multiplayer nonzero-sum game (MP-NZSG); spin-exchange relaxation-free (SERF).

资金

  1. Key Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2021B0101410005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work solves the 3-D spin polarization control problem of atomic ensembles by utilizing multiphysics fields. A novel adaptive dynamic programming structure is proposed, along with a multicritic multiaction neural network, to solve the multiplayer nonzero-sum game problem. The proposed algorithm is validated through numerical simulations in a spin-exchange relaxation-free system.
This work is the first to solve the 3-D spin polarization control (3DSPC) problem of atomic ensembles, which controls the spin polarization to achieve arbitrary states with the cooperation of multiphysics fields. First, a novel adaptive dynamic programming (ADP) structure is proposed based on the developed multicritic multiaction neural network (MCMANN) structure with nonquadratic performance functions, as a way to solve the multiplayer nonzero-sum game (MP-NZSG) problem in 3DSPC under the constraints of asymmetric saturation inputs. Then, we utilize the MCMANNs to implement the multicritic multiaction ADP (MCMA-ADP) algorithm, whose convergence is proven by the compression mapping principle. Finally, the MCMA-ADP is deployed in the spin-exchange relaxation-free (SERF) system to provide a set of control laws in 3DSPC that fully exploits the multiphysics fields to achieve arbitrary spin polarization states. Numerical simulations support the theoretical results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据