4.6 Article

Flexible supercapacitors based on a polyaniline nanowire-infilled 10 nm-diameter carbon nanotube porous membrane by in situ electrochemical polymerization

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 4, 期 32, 页码 12602-12608

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta03957j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21204059, 21274103, 21104054]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2011300]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes (Tianjin Polytechnic University) [M2-201501]
  4. Specially Appointed Professor Plan in Jiangsu Province [SR10800312, SR10800215]
  5. Project for Jiangsu Scientific and Technological Innovation team

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The significant volumetric change of electrically conducting polymers (ECPs) during the cyclic chargingdischarging process causes the capacitance to decrease and electrodes to degrade. Herein we introduce a new strategy for the synthesis of a flexible supercapacitor device based on conducting polyaniline (PANI) nanowires confined within a 10 nm-diameter multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) porous membrane. The PANI nanowires with a diameter of 8 nm and an aspect ratio over 100 are deposited inside the hollow channels of MWCNTs through an in situ electro-polymerization method. The aligned nanostructure of graphitic CNTs provides both protection to the organic polymers and efficient pathways for charge transfer. More importantly, the confined CNT nano-channels suppress the structural change of the PANI chains during multiple charging-discharging cycles and increase the lifetime of the device. Conducting polymers encapsulated inside MWCNTs as such have significant potential to be manufactured into thin, flexible supercapacitor films. The films we made showed a good electrochemical capacitance of 296 F g(-1) at a current density of 1.6 A g(-1) and considerable stability with the capacitance loss being less than 5% after 2000 charging-discharging cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据