4.6 Article

Synthesis of nanoporous structured iron carbide/Fe-N-carbon composites for efficient oxygen reduction reaction in Zn-air batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 4, 期 48, 页码 19037-19044

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta08050b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB933700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572253, 21271165]
  3. Scientific Research Grant of Hefei Science Center of CAS [2015SRG-HSC048]
  4. NSFC [51561135011]
  5. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [51561135011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-scale industrial level applications of fuel cells and metal-air batteries have called for the development of highly efficient and low-cost oxygen reduction electrodes. Here we report the effective and simple preparation of iron carbide-embedded Fe-N-doped carbon (Fe3C/Fe-N/C) composites using an iron-phenanthroline (Fe-Phen) complex and dicyandiamide (DCA) as the precursors that are subsequently heat treated. The optimal catalyst pyrolyzed at 800 degrees C (Fe-Phen-N-800) exhibits superior oxygen reduction activity with onset and half-wave potentials of 0.99 and 0.86 V in 0.1 M KOH, respectively, which are higher than those of Pt/C (onset and half-wave potentials of 0.98 and 0.84 V) at the same catalyst loading. Moreover, the obtained Fe-Phen-N-800 displays comparable activity to Pt/C in 0.1 M HClO4 solution. Notably, the well-developed Fe-Phen-N-800 catalyst shows much higher long-term stability and better methanol tolerance than Pt/C. The results suggest that our catalyst is one of the most promising candidates to replace Pt catalysts toward oxygen reduction. Strikingly, a primary Zn-air battery using Fe-Phen-N-800 as the air cathode catalyst delivers higher voltages and gravimetric energy densities than those of a Pt/C-based system at the discharge current densities of 10 and 25 mA cm(-2), thus demonstrating the potential applications of our catalyst for energy conversion devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据