3.8 Proceedings Paper

Expanding the Reach of Research Computing: A Landscape Study

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3491418.3535169

关键词

community college academics; cyberinfrastructure facilitation; academic progress in smaller schools; curricular developments

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) award BRICCs - Building Innovation at Community Colleges (NSF) [2019136]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research computing plays a crucial role in academia, but access to computing resources varies among institutions. The BRICCs community, funded by the National Science Foundation, aims to bridge the technology gaps and promote the development of curriculum to cultivate a proficient research workforce. Through landscape study and community workshops, the project identifies key findings and outlines future steps to be taken by BRICCs, funding agencies, and the broader cyberinfrastructure community.
Research-computing continues to play an ever increasing role in academia. Access to computing resources, however, varies greatly between institutions. Sustaining the growing need for computing skills and access to advanced cyberinfrastructure requires that computing resources be available to students at all levels of scholarship, including community colleges. The National Science Foundation-funded Building Research Innovation in Community Colleges (BRICCs) community set out to understand the challenges faced by administrators, researchers and faculty in building a sustainable research computing continuum that extends to smaller and two-year terminal degree granting institutions. BRICCs purpose is to address the technology gaps, and encourage the development of curriculum needed to grow a computationally proficient research workforce. Toward addressing these goals, we performed a landscape study that culminated with a community workshop. Here, we present our key findings from workshop discussions and identify next steps to be taken by BRICCs, funding agencies, and the broader cyberinfrastructure community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据