4.0 Article

Arrayed CRISPR/Cas9 Screening for the Functional Validation of Cancer Genetic Dependencies

期刊

BIO-PROTOCOL
卷 12, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

BIO-PROTOCOL
DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4577

关键词

Cancer genetic dependencies; CRISPR/Cas9; Guide RNAs; Lentivirus; Flow cytometry; Cell fitness

类别

资金

  1. European Union [813091]
  2. Austrian Science Fund [P-35628, TAI-490]
  3. Fellinger Krebsforschungsverein
  4. DOC Fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CRISPR/Cas9 screening is a revolutionary method in functional genomics that has been widely used to identify genetic dependencies in cancer cells. This article presents an efficient protocol for cloning guide RNAs into lentiviral vectors, producing lentiviral supernatants, and transducing target cells in a 96-well format. The authors also describe a competitive cell proliferation assay using flow cytometry, which allows for the simultaneous screening of multiple genes in a fast and reproducible manner. This protocol can be extended to measure other parameters accessible to flow-based measurements.
CRISPR/Cas9 screening has revolutionized functional genomics in biomedical research and is a widely used approach for the identification of genetic dependencies in cancer cells. Here, we present an efficient and versatile protocol for the cloning of guide RNAs (gRNA) into lentiviral vectors, the production of lentiviral supernatants, and the transduction of target cells in a 96-well format. To assess the effect of gene knockouts on cellular fitness, we describe a competition-based cell proliferation assay using flow cytometry, enabling the screening of many genes at the same time in a fast and reproducible manner. This readout can be extended to any parameter that is accessible to flow-based measurements, such as protein expression and stability, differentiation, cell death, and others. In summary, this protocol allows to functionally assess the effect of a set of 50-300 gene knockouts on various cellular parameters within eight weeks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据