4.4 Article

F-T heory, spinning black holes and multi-string branches

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2016)009

关键词

Black Holes in String Theory; F-Theory; Topological Strings; M-Theory

资金

  1. NSF [PHY-1067976]
  2. EPSRC First Grant UK [EP/M018903/1]
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) under the VICI grant [680-47-603]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M018903/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000326/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/M018903/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. STFC [ST/L000326/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study 5d supersymmetric black holes which descend from strings of generic N = (1, 0) supergravity in 6d. These strings have an F-theory realization in 6d as D3 branes wrapping smooth genus g curves in the base of elliptic 3-folds. They enjoy (0, 4) worldsheet supersymmetry with an extra SU(2)(L) current algebra at level g realized on the left-movers. When the smooth curves degenerate they lead to multi-string branches and we find that the microscopic worldsheet theory flows in the IR to disconnected 2d CFTs having different central charges. The single string sector is the one with maximal central charge, which when wrapped on a circle, leads to a 5d spinning BPS black hole whose horizon volume agrees with the leading entropy prediction from the Cardy formula. However, we find new phenomena where this branch meets other branches of the CFT. These include multi-string configurations which have no bound states in 6 dimensions but are bound through KK momenta when wrapping a circle, as well as loci where the curves degenerate to spheres. These loci lead to black hole configurations which can have total angular momentum relative to a Taub-Nut center satisfying J(2) > M-3 and whose number of states, though exponentially large, grows much slower than those of the large spinning black hole.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据