4.4 Article

WIMP dark matter in a well-tempered regime - A case study on singlet-doublets fermionic WIMP

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2016)070

关键词

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture (MEXT), Japan [26104009, 26287039]
  2. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan
  3. JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientists
  4. Indo French LIA THEP (Theoretical high Energy Physics) of the CNRS
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H02176, 26104009] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Serious searches for the weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) have now begun. In this context, the most important questions that need to be addressed are: To what extent can we constrain the WIMP models in the future? and What will then be the remaining unexplored regions in the WIMP parameter space for each of these models? In our quest to answer these questions, we classify WIMP in terms of quantum number and study each case adopting minimality as a guiding principle. As a first step, we study one of the simple cases of the minimal composition in the well-tempered fermionic WIMP regime, namely the singlet-doublets WIMP model. We consider all available constraints from direct and indirect searches and also the predicted constraints coming from the near future and the future experiments. We thus obtain the current status, the near future prospects and the future prospects of this model in all its generality. We find that in the future, this model will be constrained almost solely by the future direct dark matter detection experiments (as compared to the weaker indirect and collider constraints) and the cosmological (relic density) constraints and will hence be gradually pushed to the corner of the coannihilation region, if no WIMP signal is detected. Future lepton colliders will then be useful in exploring this region not constrained by any other experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据