4.3 Article

Changes of body composition and circulating adipokines in response to Nigella sativa oil with a calorie restricted diet in obese women

期刊

JOURNAL OF HERBAL MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 67-72

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.hermed.2016.03.003

关键词

Nigella sativas; Hormone; Obesity; Body fat distribution

资金

  1. Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Adipose tissue is an active endocrine organ with a key role in metabolic regulation and hormonal signaling. This study determined the effects of Nigella sativa (NS) oil with a low-calorie diet on body composition and adipokine levels in obese women. Method: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, clinical trial, 50 obese women were recruited. The participants were randomly divided into an NS oil group (n=25) and a placebo group (n = 25), and each group received either a low-calorie diet with 3 g/day NS oil or a low-calorie diet with 3 g/day placebo for 8 weeks. Body composition and biochemical parameters were measured at the baseline and at the end of the trial. Results: All 50 participants completed the trial. The participants reported no serious side effects, and the liver enzymes did not change significantly after the intervention. Mean BMI of the participants was 32.0 +/- 1.5 kg/m(2) at the baseline. NS oil decreased body fat mass (-9.5 vs. -2.9%; p < 0.01) and insulin levels (-293 vs. -8.6%; p = 0.04) and increased adiponectin levels (87.5 vs. 39.4%; p = 0.03) in the NS oil group compared to the placebo group after 8 weeks. At the end of the study, changes in BMI, insulin sensitivity, and the nuclear receptor PPAR-gamma were not significant. Conclusion: NS oil supplementation combined with a low-calorie diet can modulate hormone secretion and body composition in obese women. However, more studies are needed to clarify the efficacy of NS oil as an adjunct therapy for obesity management. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据