4.5 Article

Three-Dimensional Effects in Low-Strain Integrity Testing of Large Diameter Pipe Piles

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS
卷 142, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001117

关键词

Pipe piles; Wave propagation; Low-strain integrity testing; Pile dynamics

资金

  1. 111 project [B13024]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378177, 51420105013]
  3. ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering in Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interpretation of low-strain integrity testing performed on piles is commonly based on methods developed from the one-dimensional wave propagation theory. However, stress waves generated from the impact of the hammer on the head of a pipe pile propagate not only along the vertical, but also the circumferential and radial directions. One-dimensional methods that ignore these waves may underestimate the amplitude of the incident wave, and fail to predict the development of high-frequency interferences that may compromise the assessment of the integrity, particularly of large-diameter pipe piles. To account for these three-dimensional effects, the authors formulate a solution for determining the vertical vibration response along the cross-section of the pipe pile head to an impact load, which robustly accounts for coupling of pipe pile and viscoelastic soil vibrations. Presentation of the method is followed by a discussion on identifying the mechanisms that underlie body and surface stress-wave propagation along the section of the pipe pile head, and the conditions under which these may undermine the interpretation of pile integrity tests with conventional one-dimensional methods. A detailed parametric investigation revealed that there is an optimal position of the receiver, relative to the hammer impact, where the amplitude of the high-frequency interferences is minimized and the arrival of the reflected wave is clearly identified in the waveforms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据