4.2 Article

The preferred location of coworking spaces in Italy: an empirical investigation in urban and peripheral areas

期刊

EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 467-489

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1895080

关键词

Coworking spaces; creative industry; location determinants; metropolitan areas; inner areas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the location determinants of coworking spaces in Italy and finds that coworking is mainly an urban phenomenon, with major cities preferred due to their innovation and entrepreneurial environment. Additionally, the paper discusses the potential contribution of coworking spaces to the development of peripheral and inner areas in Italy.
With a rising globalization of the economy and society, the digital transformation, and the economic downturn started in 2008, working is becoming less dependent on distance, location, and time. These are some of the reasons that have fostered the development and diffusion of new working spaces like coworking spaces. The paper aims at exploring the location determinants of coworking spaces, an issue that has been less developed by the literature up to now. By focusing on the 549 coworking spaces located in Italy at the year 2018, the paper investigates the location factors of such workplaces, and the attractiveness of large cities as well as peripheral areas. The results of the descriptive statistics and the econometric analysis (a Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial model is applied) confirm that coworking is mainly an urban phenomenon, since coworking spaces tend to be knowledge-intensive places for creative people. Specifically, the municipalities showing higher innovation and entrepreneurial environment (i.e. major cities) are preferred locations. Besides, it is discussed whether coworking spaces may contribute to fostering the development of peripheral and inner areas in Italy, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic where the share of teleworkers outside metropolitan areas has massively increased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据