Postcolonial disjuncture: Kashmir as the other in Basharat Peer's Curfewed Night

Basharat Peer's Curfewed Night (2008) is a perspicacious commentary on the violence, exile and dispossession that have wrecked the lives of ordinary Kashmiris since 1947. Peer compellingly ruminates on the gradual loss of the Kashmiris' belongingness in the last few decades that eventually curtailed their sense of individual and collective selfhood. The present article aims to analyse how Peer's memoir emerges as a crucial intervention in focusing on the othering of Kashmiris in postcolonial India. This article will examine how Peer's personal story shapes his creative expression of homeland and uncovers the gradual stymieing of Kashmiri Muslim citizenship and identity under Indian statehood, perhaps most alarmingly manifested in the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. This article will look at how Peer's narrative interrogates the predominating imaginations of Kashmir as the other in the pan-Indian psyche and engages with the inherent ambivalence of the nationalist discourse of India. Accordingly, the article will also study how Peer positions Kashmir as a heterotopic space that transcends any form of monolithic comprehension. In so doing, Peer's memoir emerges as an alternative and autoethnographic chronicling of the Kashmir story undercutting the dominant assumptions, reinforced by the Indian nationalist project. Pertinently, the concepts of ambivalence and heterotopia are drawn from the theoretical perspectives of Homi Bhabha and Michael Foucault, respectively.

Automated summary

Basharat Peer's memoir, Curfewed Night, offers a insightful commentary on the violence and displacement experienced by ordinary Kashmiris since 1947. Peer's personal story highlights the gradual loss of belongingness among Kashmiris, ultimately diminishing their sense of self and collective identity. This article analyzes how Peer's memoir intervenes in the othering of Kashmiris in postcolonial India, specifically examining the diminishing Kashmiri Muslim citizenship and identity under Indian statehood. Additionally, it explores how Peer challenges the prevailing imaginations of Kashmir as the other in the Indian nationalist discourse, positioning it as a heterotopic space beyond monolithic comprehension.