4.6 Article

Effect of a second metal (Co, Fe, Mo and W) on performance of Ni2P/SiO2 for hydrodeoxygenation of methyl laurate

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 418-426

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2016.02.007

关键词

Bimetallic phosphide; Solid solution; Methyl laurate; Hydrodeoxygenation; Decarbonylation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21176177]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [12JCYBJC13200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ni2P/SiO2 and bimetallic NiMP/SiO2 (M = Co, Fe, Mo, W; Ni/M atomic ratio=5) catalysts were prepared by the temperature-programmed reduction method. The catalysts and their precursors were characterized by means of UV-Vis DRS, H-2-TPR, XRD, TEM, CO chemisorption and NH3-TPD. Their performance for the deoxygenation of methyl laurate was tested on a fixed-bed reactor. The results show that the main phase was Ni2P in all catalysts, and M (M = Co, Fe, Mo, W) entered the lattice of Ni2P forming solid solution. Different from Fe and Co, the introduction of Mo and W into Ni2P/SiO2 reduced the phosphide particle size and increased the acid amount. In the deoxygenation reaction, the turnover frequency of methyl laurate increased on the catalysts in the order of NiMoP/SiO2, Ni2P/SiO2, NiWP/SiO2, NiFeP/SiO2 and NiCoP/SiO2, which is influenced by the size of phosphide particles and the interaction between Ni and M (M =Fe, Co, Mo or W). The introduction of the second metal (especially Mo and W) into Ni2P/SiO2 promoted the hydrodeoxygenation pathway. This is mainly attributed to the interaction between Ni and the second metal. Finally, the NiMoP/SiO2 catalyst was tested at 340 degrees C, 3 MPa, methyl laurate WHSV of 14 h(-1) and H-2/methyl laurate molar ratio of 25 for 132 h, and its deactivation took place. We found that the catalyst deactivation mainly resulted from carbonaceous deposit rather than the sintering of metal phosphide crystallites. (C) 2016 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据