期刊
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 69, 期 3, 页码 1835-1855出版社
INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4381
关键词
capital asset pricing model; asset pricing tests
This study empirically tests the conditional capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and finds that it successfully explains the conditional level of asset returns when the cost of hedging is nil. However, it fails to explain the cross section of average asset returns. The study provides an explanation for the coexistence of these two apparently contradictory results.
When the cost of hedging is nil, the conditional capital asset pricing model (CAPM) holds. We empirically test the conditional CAPM by regressing asset returns onto the product of their conditional betas and market returns. Estimated intercepts are not statistically different from zero, implying that the conditional CAPM successfully explains the conditional level of asset returns. Yet, unconditional betas do not explain the cross section of average asset returns; the unconditional CAPMfails. We show why and how the success of the conditional CAPM actually explains the failure of the unconditional CAPM, thereby rationalizing the coexistence of these two intriguing results.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据