4.4 Article

SNAP work requirements increase mental health care use

期刊

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 60-66

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14033

关键词

anxiety; depression; food insecurity; Medicaid; policy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study measured the impact of SNAP work requirements on mental health care use. The findings showed that exposure to work requirements led to an increase in health care use for mood disorders and anxiety among beneficiaries. The effect of the policy differed between men and women.
Objective We measured the impact of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) work requirements on mental health care use. Data Sources and Study Setting We used 2015-2018 West Virginia Medicaid and SNAP data. Study Design Nine counties were exposed to SNAP work requirements. Using an event study framework, we assessed how this changed the probability and number of visits for depression and anxiety in the treatment versus the control group. Data Collection/Extraction Methods The sample included individuals aged 18-49, enrolled in both SNAP and Medicaid at the start of the study. Dually eligible individuals were excluded. Principal Findings At baseline, the probability of having a mood disorder visit was 6.1% among women and 5.3% among men, rising by 0.9 percentage points (SE 0.4, relative change +14.1%) among women and 0.7 percentage points (SE 0.3, relative change +13.0%) among men after exposure to work requirements. The probability of having an anxiety visit rose by 1.0 (SE 0.4) percentage points among women, a 17.8% relative increase over the baseline of 5.8%. Among men, the likelihood of having an anxiety visit increased by 1.0 percentage points (SE 0.5), a relative change of 24.3% over a baseline probability of 5.0%, though this effect occurred much more gradually compared to women. Conclusions Exposure to SNAP work requirements was associated with increases in health care use for mood disorders and anxiety among enrollees. The policy's effect differed between men and women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据