4.4 Article

Estimated the frequencies of a coupled damped nonlinear oscillator with the non-Perturbative method

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14613484221130148

关键词

Non-conservative system; conjugate coupled nonlinear oscillators; linearized method; quasi-exact solution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a comprehensive investigation of achieving the simplest solution for non-conservative coupled nonlinear forced oscillators. A non-perturbative method is employed to establish an equivalent linear system, which allows for quasi-exact solutions and easy determination of frequency-amplitude relationships. The approach is validated through numerical calculations and shows perfect accuracy when compared with exact numerical solutions. The method has wide applicability in engineering and other sciences.
The current article is concerned with a comprehensive investigation of achieving the simplest solution of non-conservative coupled nonlinear forced oscillators. The article mainly depends on a non-perturbative method. It depends on yielding an equivalent linear system. The advantage of this linear system is that its coefficients are easily computed and that they include the effects of the original nonlinear coefficients. This linearization approach allows achieving quasi-exact solutions even in the presence of periodic forces. The relationships of frequencies with amplitudes are easily established. The analytical solution so yielded may serve as a basis for a qualitative understanding of the actual behavior of the coupled nonlinear oscillators. Additionally, numerical calculations are carried out graphically to address the validation of the new approach and to further illustrate the effectiveness and convenience of the method. The results are compared with the exact numerical solutions which show perfect accuracy. The method can be easily extended to other nonlinear systems and can therefore be exceedingly applicable in engineering and other sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据