4.8 Article

Detachable and hierarchical assemblies for recyclable and highly efficient oil-fouling removal

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 2551-2562

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4986-y

关键词

dynamic covalent bond; hierarchical assembly; oil-fouling removal; emulsion; oil/water separation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The large-scale use of detergents for oil-fouling removal in industry generates a significant amount of wastewater, leading to economic and environmental problems. This study presents a recyclable, efficient, and eco-friendly approach to remove oil-fouling by constructing a dynamic imine-based surfactant.
Large-scale use of detergents to remove oil-fouling in industry continuously generates tremendous amounts of wastewater and thus leads to both economic and environmental problems. To develop recyclable oil-fouling removal strategy is an appealing solution but a challenging task. Herein, a kind of dynamic imine-based surfactant has been constructed by 2-formylbenzenesulfonic acid sodium salt (FBSS) and linear amines (CnNH2, n = 6, 7, 8, 10, and 12). Owing to high interfacial activity and strong assembly ability, dynamic FBSS/C8NH2 system can remove oil-fouling on multiple substrates for at least 10 cycles, largely reducing the toxicity to ecosystem. At basic pH, the hierarchical assemblies (from vesicle to network and hollow sphere) are formed and boost surfactant molecule enrichment around oil-fouling, leading to highly efficient emulsification. When pH is changed to acidic condition, the surfactant molecules dissociate due to the breaking of imine bonds, and accordingly the emulsion is destroyed and the released oil droplets float to the top layer. After removing the oil-fouling and adjusting the solution back to basic pH, the surfactant assemblies are reconstructed and used for the next oil-fouling cleaning cycle. This study provides a recyclable, efficient and eco-friendly oil-fouling removal approach, satisfying the need of sustainable development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据