4.8 Review

Solid-state NMR studies on the organic matrix of bone

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 2980-2990

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-5034-7

关键词

bone matrix; solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR); collagen dynamics; biomineralization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the progress in solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) studies of organic components in bone, including collagen and other non-protein biomolecules. These studies provide important insights into the molecular details of bone and suggest future directions for research.
Bone is a hierarchical architecture that consists of both inorganic and organic components. The organic components, including collagen and numerous non-collagenous biomolecules, are crucial for maintaining the mechanical strength and physiological functions of bone. The native structures of organic components and especially the mutual interactions between different components are important questions to be addressed. Among different analytical techniques, solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) spectroscopy is a powerful tool to reveal the chemical and interactional information at an atomic level. Recent advancements of SSNMR technology and experimental protocols have brought great advances in understanding the molecular details in native bones. In this review, we summarize the progresses on the SSNMR studies of various organic components in the bone matrix. In the first part, we review the studies on collagen from four different aspects: (1) water-associated molecular dynamics; (2) the intrahelicallinterhelical interactions in collagen residues; (3) the interactions between collagen and citrate; and (4) the cross-linking between collagen and inorganic surface. In the second part, we review the studies on the non -protein biomolecules including sugar species, citrate, lipids, and nucleic acids. In the end, we propose an outlook of future directions for SSNMR investigations on bones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据