4.4 Article

Analytical modeling of the virtual sound insulation measurement suite and research on sound insulation test methods

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14613484221133628

关键词

Spectral geometry method; Plate structure; Reverberation chamber; Sound insulation; Sound intensity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the factors affecting the noise reduction performance of flexible partition walls using the Spectral geometry method and parametric analysis. The results show that the proposed method provides a new and accurate approach for calculating the sound insulation performance.
With the development of modern industrial technology, it is an essential problem to calculate the noise reduction performance of the flexible partition walls. The sound insulation measurement model is modeled by the Spectral geometry method (SGM). Compared with the traditional ones, it is a method with higher calculation accuracy and faster convergence speed. The displacement of the panel and the sound pressure field inside the rooms are expressed as Fourier series with additional items. In order to simulate the real measurement environment, the sound source room and the receiving room are set as a reverberation chamber and an anechoic chamber with impedance boundaries, respectively. The coupling relationship is established by the Hamilton's principle. Then the natural frequencies and the sound pressure level are compared with those derived by the finite element method (FEM). The results show that the analytical method has good accuracy and convergence. Moreover, the sound transmission loss (STL) of the partition could be obtained by the sound pressure method. Considering there is no accurate method for measuring the STL, this paper studies some factors affecting the sound insulation performance of the model by the parametric analysis method, such as the thickness of the panel, the length of the receiving room, the impedance of the receiving room and the parameters of medium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据