4.0 Article

Early developmental phenotypes in the cystic fibrosis sheep model

期刊

FASEB BIOADVANCES
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 13-26

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fba.2022-00085

关键词

CF development; CFTR; CF GI tract; CF liver; CF lung; CF pancreas; CF sheep model; CF trachea; early CF pathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Highly effective modulator therapies make CF a treatable condition. Using an ovine model, the study investigates the in utero origins of CF disease and finds that CF already causes damage in the digestive tract and respiratory system before birth. The study also shows that CFTR (-/-) tissues exhibit histological abnormalities by 80 days of gestation, equivalent to 21 weeks in humans.
Highly effective modulator therapies for cystic fibrosis (CF) make it a treatable condition for many people. However, although CF respiratory illness occurs after birth, other organ systems particularly in the digestive tract are damaged before birth. We use an ovine model of CF to investigate the in utero origins of CF disease since the sheep closely mirrors critical aspects of human development. Wildtype (WT) and CFTR (-/-) sheep tissues were collected at 50, 65, 80, 100, and 120 days of gestation and term (147 days) and used for histological, electrophysiological, and molecular analysis. Histological abnormalities are evident in CFTR-/- (-/-) animals by 80 days of gestation, equivalent to 21 weeks in humans. Acinar and ductal dilation, mucus obstruction, and fibrosis are observed in the pancreas; biliary fibrosis, cholestasis, and gallbladder hypoplasia in the liver; and intestinal meconium obstruction, as seen at birth in all large animal models of CF. Concurrently, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-dependent short circuit current is present in WT tracheal epithelium by 80 days gestation and is absent from CFTR (-/-) tissues. Transcriptomic profiles of tracheal tissues confirm the early expression of CFTR and suggest that its loss does not globally impair tracheal differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据