4.6 Review

The prognosis and clinicopathological significance of histone deacetylase in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 1515-1536

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-022-00934-w

关键词

Histone deacetylases; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Prognosis; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the significance of different types of HDACs in HCC prognosis and clinicopathological features. The high expression of class I, II, and III HDACs was associated with poorer overall survival and various clinicopathological characteristics. These findings suggest that different types of HDACs may serve as valuable biomarkers for HCC.
The value of the different types of HDACs (histone deacetylases) for HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) prognosis and clinicopathological features is still controversial. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the possible role of different types of HDACs in HCC. Until October 28, 2021, we have searched the Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), SinoMed, Chinese China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese WanFang, and Chinese Weipu databases and evaluated eligible studies according to the criteria. We used hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to evaluate the prognostic effects of different types of HDACs on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS) and used odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% CI to evaluate the significance of HDACs on clinicopathological characteristics. The I-2 statistic and chi-square-based Q test were used to assess the heterogeneity. When the heterogeneity was significant, we conducted a subgroup analysis. In addition, Egger's test and funnel chart were used to assess publication bias. The high expression of class I HDACs was associated with poorer OS, DFS/RFS and differentiation, intrahepatic metastasis, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM), tumor number, tumor size, vascular invasion, and other poor clinicopathological characteristics. The high expression of class II HDACs was related to poor OS and multiple and larger tumors. After subgroup analysis, class II HDACs may also be related to worse TNM and Edmondson grading. The high expression of class III HDACs was related to poor OS, hepatitis B, liver cirrhosis, serum AFP, and vascular invasion. But it was more common in women and was related to single, smaller tumors. Type I, II, and III HDACs are associated with poor prognosis, and there are also correlations with some clinicopathological features, suggesting that different types of HDACs may be valuable biomarkers for HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据