4.3 Article

An Indigenous perspective on the conservation of an insular endemic: the prehensile-tailed skink Corucia zebrata on the Solomon Islands

期刊

ORYX
卷 57, 期 1, 页码 30-39

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0030605321001253

关键词

Corucia zebrata; pet trade; prehensile-tailed skink; Solomon Islands; tropical forests; wildlife

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study surveyed the habitat preferences, conservation status perceptions, and potential threats of the endemic prehensile-tailed skink in the Solomon Islands. The results showed that the skinks prefer lowland and hill forests, while coastal and montane forests were less favored habitats. Habitat loss, hunting, and predation were identified as the main threats. Individuals under 30 years old reported more frequent killings of the skinks.
The prehensile-tailed skink Corucia zebrata is endemic to the Solomon Islands. It is the most traded reptile from the country. During 2000-2019, CITES reported the legal export of 10,567 individuals. Although the level of this trade is well documented, impacts on the skink's survival in its native range are comparatively unknown. During January-May 2020, we surveyed 146 people on 12 islands to collect information on the habitats preferred by the prehensile-tailed skink, to understand perceptions of the species' conservation status and identify any potential threats. Respondents reported lowland and hill forests as being favoured habitats, with low proportions of respondents identifying coastal and montane forests as suitable habitat. Habitat loss (72%), hunting (17%), and predation (6%) were identified as the main threats. People younger than 30 years of age reported killing the skinks more frequently than did people over the age of 30. Prehensile-tailed skinks have a relatively small home range, long reproductive cycle, and are vulnerable to numerous threats. We thus recommend a halt to the current practice of exporting wild-caught prehensile-tailed skinks, and replacement by a well-regulated captive breeding programme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据