3.8 Review

Addressing rheumatic fever inequities in Aotearoa New Zealand: a scoping review of prevention interventions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 59-66

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/HC22093

关键词

inequity; intervention; New Zealand; Pacific; Pasifika; Maori; rheumatic fever; rheumatic heart disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This scoping review explores the range of interventions and initiatives in New Zealand aimed at preventing Group A Streptococcus (GAS) infection and rheumatic fever, with a focus on Pacific and Maori populations. Positive short-term outcomes were reported for some interventions, but long-term reduction in rheumatic fever rates have not been observed. Evaluation outcomes were lacking for many initiatives and Pacific and Maori communities were primarily involved in an advisory or delivery role rather than in co-design or leadership.
Introduction. Rheumatic fever is a preventable illness caused by untreated Group A Streptococcus (GAS) infection. Despite reductions in most high-income countries, rheumatic fever rates remain a concern in Aotearoa New Zealand. Pacific and Maori people are inequitably affected, with risk of initial hospitalisation due to rheumatic fever 12- and 24-fold more likely, respectively, compared to non-Maori and non-Pacific people. Aim. This scoping review aims to explore the range of interventions and initiatives in New Zealand seeking to prevent GAS and rheumatic fever, with a particular focus on Pacific and Maori. Methods. Databases Scopus, Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL, along with grey literature sources, were searched to broadly identify interventions in New Zealand. Data were screened for eligibility and the final articles were charted into a stocktake table. Results. Fifty-eight studies were included, reporting 57 interventions. These targeted school-based throat swabbing, awareness and education, housing, secondary prophylaxis, improving primary care guidelines and diagnosis of sore throats and skin infections. Some interventions reported short-term outcomes of improvements in awareness, a reduction in rheumatic fever risk and fewer hospitalisations. Evaluation outcomes were, however, lacking for many initiatives. Pacific and Maori people primarily served only in an advisory or delivery capacity, rather than as partners in co-design or leadership from the beginning. Discussion. Although positive outcomes were reported for some interventions identified in this review, rheumatic fever rates have not shown any long-term reduction over time. Co-designing interventions with affected communities could ensure that strategies are better targeted and do not contribute to further stigma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据